Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 11:14

Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Check your tickets! Winning MegaMillions ticket sold in Ohio - WHIO TV
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Voyager IPO: Stock Rockets 84% Higher in Trading Debut - Barron's
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Margaret Cho: Ellen DeGeneres 'Not Nice to Me for Most of My Career' - Variety
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What are the defining characteristics of woke liberals and conservatives in the United States?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Daniel Jones touts "productive spring" in learning, understanding Colts offense - NBC Sports
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Tesla Stock Is Falling on a Downgrade. The Musk-Trump Feud Isn’t Helping. - Barron's